Cases 91 - 100 of 518
BLAND v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17579
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20 and GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMIE BLAND and JASMINE BLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHERIDAN v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK / NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2019cv16893
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK / NEW JERSEY, PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP., ABC CORP. 1-10 (fictitious entities) and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHERIDAN
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BREITFELLER v. LUCANTE et al
as 3:2019cv16524
Defendant:
ABC CORP 1-20, JERRY A LUCANTE and JOHN DOE 1-20
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BREITFELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BREITFELLER v. LUCANTE et al
as 2:2019cv16524
Defendant:
ABC CORP 1-20, JERRY A LUCANTE and JOHN DOE 1-20
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BREITFELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERNANDEZ v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2019cv16343
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20 (Fictitious Names), MARK RICHARDSON BUTLER, ABC CORP 1-20(fictitious) and others
Plaintiff:
VANESSA FERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMOKER et al v. PYLES et al
as 3:2019cv15251
Defendant:
B&S TRUCKING LLC, JOHN DOE #1-20, ABC CORP #1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORA SMOKER and DANIEL SMOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMOKER et al v. PYLES et al
as 1:2019cv15251
Defendant:
ABC CORP #1-20, JOHN DOE #1-20, XYZ COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORA SMOKER and DANIEL SMOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHWARTZ et al v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2019cv14945
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-20, CHANEL T. DAVIS and ABC CORP. 1-20
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. SCHWARTZ, JR. and GISELLE SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv14548
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOE et al v. WOODBRIDGE et al
as 2:2019cv14139
Defendant:
DEF CORP 1-10, SUPERVISOR PAULA POE 1-10, GHI CORP. 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
K. O., MARY MOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
