Cases 91 - 100 of 127
Holse v. Daugherty
as 3:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kent Holse, Jr
Defendant:
Debra Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2012cv00121
Petitioner:
KENT EASLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EASLEY v. SMITH
as 1:2011cv01276
Petitioner:
KENT EASLEY
Respondent:
MR. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
0912187 BC Unlimited Liability Company v. Hunter et al
as 1:2011cv00331
Plaintiff:
0912187 BC Unlimited Liability Company
Defendant:
Kurt J Hunter , Kent J Hunter and Carol S Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGGINS et al v. KOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
as 3:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HIGGINS, KENT HIGGINS, JOHN TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
KOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HIGGINS et al v. KOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
as 4:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HIGGINS, KENT HIGGINS, JOHN TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
KOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EASLEY v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2011cv00280
Petitioner:
KENT EASLEY
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Sexton et al
as 2:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Miller
Defendant:
Barbereen Sexton , Kent Blankenship , Larry Kolodziej and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2010cv01018
Defendant:
WADE KENT, WENDY KNIGHT and PEN PRODUCTS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BRIAN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
