Cases 91 - 100 of 932
Andrew Valles v. Kathleen Allison
as 23-55264
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW VALLES
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON
Van Buren v. Dennison et al
as 5:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Irvin Van Buren
Defendant:
Paul Dennison, Allison MacBeth, S. Gee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Temple v. Gibson et al
as 2:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Temple
Defendant:
Michael Gibson, Imo Ebong, Martin Cadeiras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Garrett v. Allison et al
as 1:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Craig K. Garrett
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison and Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mwasi v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
King Mwasi
Defendant:
Warden Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, CA Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Martinez v. Allison
as 1:2023cv00323
Petitioner:
Carlos Martinez
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00889
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Brown
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Martinez v. Allison
as 1:2023cv00243
Petitioner:
Carlos Martinez
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Daniel Alexander v. Jerry Brown et al
as 8:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Alexander
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Kathleen Allison, Jeffrey A Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
