Cases 91 - 100 of 248
Morris et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03486
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Terry J Morris and Christina Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv03298
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02813
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Sharon A Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Kelliher et al
as 4:2019cv00245
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and John F Kelliher, Jr.
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Classic Residence Management Limited Partnership
as 2:2019cv02556
Defendant:
Classic Residence Management LP and Classic Residence Management LP doing business as Vi
Plaintiff:
Davina Morris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rodriguez #242516 v. Morris et al
as 2:2019cv02092
Petitioner:
Daniel Alexander Rodriguez
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Stephen Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris et al v. National Cash Offer LLC
as 2:2019cv01661
Defendant:
National Cash Offer LLC
Plaintiff:
Jon Powell and Sylvia Morris
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Morris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01425
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris #168303 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00093
Petitioner:
Gabriel Christopher Morris
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peoples v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00860
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Morris Peoples, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
