Cases 91 - 100 of 181
Rossell v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2014cv02737
Plaintiff:
Marico Tremayne Rossell
Defendant:
Toney Armstrong, John Doe, J. Williford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acuff et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Bryan Acuff , Gabriel Archer , Michael Ashe and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. USA
as 3:2014cv00277
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Murphy Joey King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murphy v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv02417
Petitioner:
Julius Murphy
Respondent:
Tammy Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Correct Care Solution
as 3:2014cv01070
Plaintiff:
Sharn Green
Defendant:
Daniela l/n/u, (f/n/u) Foster, (f/n/u) Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Schofield et al
as 1:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Torrey Frazier
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Brenda Jones and Darrell Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. One 2006 Bentley Continental, VIN #SCBBR53W96C039675, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon et al
as 2:2013cv02983
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2006 Bentley Continental, VIN #SCBBR53W96C039675, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon
Claimant:
Kevin Dewayne Murphy, Cassandra Lashon Murphy and Wells Fargo Dealer Services
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01140
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Worthington et al v. DIMA S.L. et al
as 3:2013cv00651
Plaintiff:
Lori Worthington , Kimberly Conrad , Leona Roberts and others
Defendant:
DIMA S.L., Neomedic International, S.L., Neomedic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
