Cases 91 - 100 of 291
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01440
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Mantel v. Par Broadcasting Company, Inc.
as 4:2018cv01430
Defendant:
Par Broadcasting Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Mantel
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Watts v. U.S. Marshals Service Western District of Missouri
as 4:2018cv00606
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service Western District of Missouri
Plaintiff:
Terry D. Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scallion et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2018cv00191
Defendant:
BASF SE, BASF Corporation, E I DuPont De Nemours and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall W. Scallion and Brooke W. Scallion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fry v. USA
as 4:2018cv01168
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marshall Fry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ramsey v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2018cv01101
Petitioner:
James E. Ramsey
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bugg v. Honey et al
as 2:2018cv04124
Plaintiff:
Eldon Bugg
Defendant:
Marc Honey, Wm Marshall Hubbard, Honey Law Firm P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. West Tennessee Detention Facility et al
as 4:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Arther James
Defendant:
West Tennessee Detention Facility and US Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dinkins v. US Marshals et al
as 4:2018cv00814
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Dinkins
Defendant:
US Marshals, Plane Staff BOP, State of GA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson et al v. William Dirks Dameron, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
Marshal T. Simpson , Donald S. Simpson and Christopher Boyd
Defendant:
William Dirks Dameron, LLC and Matthew L. Dameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
