Cases 91 - 100 of 224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv20855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv20814
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jordan Jones v. George Solomon
as 19-6143
Defendant / Appellee:
JONNITA BAKER, Inmate Grievance Examiner for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, TYLER STOCKTON, Correctional Officer for the Avery Unit of Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution, SCOTTY LOWERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN ANDREW JONES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv62805
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv24772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morrow v. Capra et al
as 7:2018cv09749
Defendant:
All Captains, Superintendent Michael Capra, Officer in Charge and others
Plaintiff:
Neb Morrow, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-56160
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Avazdavani v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv23376
Defendant:
Officer in Charge for the Krome Service Processing Center, US I.C.E. Field Office Director for the Miami Field Office, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Milad Avazdavani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Avazdavani v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv23299
Defendant:
Attorney General, I.C.E. Deputy Director and Acting Director, Officer in Charge (OIC)for The Krome Service Processing Center and others
Plaintiff:
Milad Avazdavani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
