Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 91 - 100 of 500
Parker v. Thurman
as 4:2021cv00080
Defendant: Cynthia Thurman and Summer Raley
Plaintiff: Christopher A. Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Dong et al
as 1:2021cv01435
Defendant: Kennestone Hospital, J. A. King, Deputy Shelat and others
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinds v. Parker et al
as 1:2021cv01316
Plaintiff: Marvin Hinds and Mobey Ben El
Defendant: T. Cosby and D. Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01033
Defendant: Andy Gill, John Does 1-4, Eric Frazier and others
Plaintiff: Shamar Dwight Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00854
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sunrise Builders, Inc. v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv00715
Respondent: Sonna Singleton Gregory, Clayton County Zoning Advisory Group, Carlton Holloway and others
Petitioner: Sunrise Builders, Inc.
Bibbins v. Cowens et al
as 1:2021cv00700
Defendant: Mam-Zak, Inc., John Doe Motor Carriers & Insurers (1-3), Great West Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff: Walter J. Bibbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker v. Georgia Department of Correction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00025
Defendant: Ms. Jaqulyn Champion, Ms. Ruth Shelton, Mr. Edward Philbin and others
Plaintiff: Rico Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00043
Not Classified By Court: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: VICKIE MICHELLE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00016
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?