Cases 91 - 100 of 132
INZAR v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv05547
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE INZAR
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY LANIGAN, PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2016cv05525
Petitioner:
ANTONIO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2016cv05525
Petitioner:
ANTONIO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SCOTT v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2016cv05294
Petitioner:
RICHARD A SCOTT
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BASS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv05332
Petitioner:
SHARIF BASS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FUSCALDO v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2016cv04198
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FUSCALDO
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALKER v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2016cv03752
Petitioner:
SHEM WALKER
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FERGUSON v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2016cv03304
Plaintiff:
RASHAUN FERGUSON
Defendant:
PATRICK NOGAN, EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON, (JOHN DOE) GRANADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRABOWSKI v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2016cv03349
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD GRABOWSKI
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSE JR. v. S.C.O. et al
as 2:2016cv03100
Plaintiff:
TROY R. ROSE JR.
Defendant:
S.C.O., PATRICK NOGAN, GARY LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
