Cases 91 - 100 of 132
Ricks et al v. National Institutes of Health et al
as 8:2015cv02822
Plaintiff:
Vicky S. Ricks and Louis Ricks, III
Defendant:
National Institutes of Health , Health and Human Services , Secretary Burwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
GREEN v. PEREZ et al
as 1:2015cv01835
Plaintiff:
MARVIN E. GREEN
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez and DOL, LICENSING AND REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perez v. Maryland Division of Corrections
as 1:2015cv01635
Plaintiff:
Ruben Perez
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01524
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arlene Jones , Melissa Williams , Cassandra Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
OGUNSULA v. HOLDER et al
as 8:2015cv01297
Plaintiff:
VERONICA W. OGUNSULA
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., James B. Comey, Thomas E. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Soda v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 1:2015cv00898
Plaintiff:
Frank Soda
Defendant:
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Phyllis Matthews Burwell, Jacob K. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Broadcast Music, Inc et al v. Demorett, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc , Concord Music Group, Inc. , Abkco Music, Inc and others
Defendant:
Demorett, LLC and Amber A. Demorett-Perez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Perez v. USA - 2255
as 1:2015cv00848
Petitioner:
Ivan Altamirano Perez
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez Esquite v. Braga De Araujo et al
as 8:2015cv00624
Plaintiff:
Jose Alejandro Perez Esquite
Defendant:
Marcelo Souza Braga De Araujo and M Brothers Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Williams et al
as 8:2015cv00056
Defendant:
Nathan Williams, NW Systems, Inc and NW Systems Inc. 401(k) Profit-Sharing Plan and Trust
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
