Cases 91 - 100 of 115
Rice v. Gross et al
as 2:2008cv00747
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rice and Jeffrey Rice
Defendant:
Lori Gross, Brenda Chapman, Jeannie Wachs and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rivera v. Huibregtse et al
as 3:2008cv00515
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rivera
Defendant:
Peter Huibregtse, Gary Boughton and Amy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRY, JAMES II v. HUIBREGTSE
as 3:2008cv00496
Petitioner:
TERRY, JAMES II
Respondent:
PETER HUIBREGTSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luckett v. Huibregtse et al
as 3:2008cv00449
Plaintiff:
Lervoltis Luckett
Defendant:
Peter Huibregtse, Nurse Mora, Nurse Amy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tayr Al Ghashiyah v. Peter Huibregtse
as 08-3196
Petitioner - Appellant:
TAYR K. AL GHASHIYAH (KHAN), Khan
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER HUIBREGTSE, Warden
Rowell II v. Gozinske et al
as 3:2008cv00467
Plaintiff:
Sean F. Rowell II
Defendant:
Tom Gozinske, AMY SMITH, PETER HUIBREGTSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Polzin v. Huibregtse
as 3:2008cv00437
Plaintiff:
Sarah Polzin
Defendant:
Peter Huibregtse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson, Titus et al v. Raemisch, Rick et al
as 3:2008cv00390
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson, Garfield Cooley, Al-Amin Akbar and others
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch , Peter Huibregtse , Mark Heise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al Ghashiyah v. Huibregtse
as 3:2008cv00413
Defendant:
Peter Huibregtse
Petitioner:
Tayr Kilaab Al Ghashiyah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis et al v. Schneiter et al
as 2:2008cv00504
Plaintiff:
Allen Tony Davis and Rodney Foster
Defendant:
Richard A Schneiter, Peter Huibregtse, Gary Boughton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
