Cases 91 - 100 of 5,467
Mendelson et al v. Town of Rhinebeck New York et al
as 7:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Harold L Mendelson and Mildred B. Mendelson
Defendant:
Town of Rhinebeck New York, Michael Trimble, Elizabeth Spinzia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valk v. Hubbard et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Justin Valk
Defendant:
John L. Hubbard and Shawn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christenson v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Christenson
Defendant:
Marc Smith, Joseph Biden, Gary Saleise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdullah v. NYPD 30th Precinct et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Abdul H. Abdullah
Defendant:
NYPD 30th Precinct, P.O. Randy Delgado, P.O. M. Ducasse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dees et al v. Zurlo et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Dees and Ethan Davis Smith
Defendant:
Michael Zurlo, Jeffrey R. Brown, Jillian Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OZY Media, Inc. v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv09412
Plaintiff:
OZY Media, Inc.
Defendant:
Benjamin Smith, Semafor, Inc. and BuzzFeed, Inc.
Beutel et al v. County of Jefferson et al
as 5:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Beutel, Michael Bacon, Alfred Baker and others
Defendant:
County of Jefferson and Karen Christie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Joseph Peter Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Smith v. Doe et al
as 6:2023cv06719
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Smith
Defendant:
John Doe and Niagara Falls Polices
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
Sarah Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
