Cases 91 - 100 of 122
Schuenke, Lloyd et al v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00865
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T. Schuenke and Ernest M. Hanson
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Edward Wall, Charles Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quarra Stone Company, LLC v. Yale University et al
as 3:2013cv00790
Plaintiff:
Quarra Stone Company, LLC
Defendant:
Yale University , Whiting-Turner Contracting Company and Cap Stone Rock Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner, William v. Albert, John et al
as 3:2013cv00696
Plaintiff:
William B. Turner
Defendant:
John Albert and Carlos Esqueda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner, Brenda v. Schmitt, Donald et al
as 3:2013cv00531
Plaintiff:
Brenda Turner and Donald C. Schmitt
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Turner v. Pollard
as 2:2013cv00731
Petitioner:
Jermaine Turner
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner, James v. Rataczak, Michael
as 3:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Robert Turner
Defendant:
Michael Rataczak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Kubat et al
as 1:2012cv01182
Plaintiff:
Robert Turner
Defendant:
Kubat and Wenzol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv01080
Plaintiff:
Lash L Turner
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Turner, James v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2012cv00699
Plaintiff:
James R. Turner
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , Michael Meisner , Charles Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner, Glenn v. Cox, Burton, et al
as 3:2012cv00502
Plaintiff:
Glenn T. Turner
Defendant:
Burton Cox, Jr. and Jolinda Waterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
