Cases 91 - 100 of 195
Povolny v. Washington, County of
as 0:2014cv03260
Plaintiff:
Steven T. Povolny
Defendant:
County of Washington
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Washington v. Mark et al
as 0:2014cv03209
Plaintiff:
Theron Preston Washington
Defendant:
Mark and Volunteer of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv03149
Plaintiff:
Virginia Washington
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'Andrea v. Washington, County of
as 0:2014cv03139
Plaintiff:
Thomas D'Andrea
Defendant:
Washington, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02619
Plaintiff:
Deidre Washington
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kerr Karasov v. Caplan Law Firm, P.A. et al
as 0:2014cv01503
Plaintiff:
Patricia Mae Kerr Karasov
Defendant:
Caplan Law Firm, P.A., City of Bloomington, City of Brooklyn Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engebretson v. Aitkin County et al
as 0:2014cv01435
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marie Engebretson
Defendant:
Aitkin County , Big Stone County , City of Biwabik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Attorney General (Current) (Minnesota)
as 0:2014cv01169
Plaintiff:
Theron Preston Washington
Defendant:
Attorney General (Current) (Minnesota)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Holley et al
as 0:2014cv01007
Plaintiff:
Theron Preston Washington
Defendant:
Robert J. Holley, Tonia Reaves, Michael Plaxico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sherno v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2014cv00982
Defendant:
Anoka County , City of Apple Valley , City of Arlington and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallace Sherno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
