Cases 91 - 100 of 425,997
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA & VICINITY et al v. KEVIN RYDER, INC
as 2:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and MARIA SCHEELER
Defendant:
KEVIN RYDER, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
PATEL v. ANOOPAM MISSION, INC.
as 5:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
GARIMA PATEL
Defendant:
ANOOPAM MISSION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HAYWARD v. CASH APP
as 2:2024cv01812
Plaintiff:
KALIMA JAMILA HAYWARD
Defendant:
CASH APP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
IN RE: GARVIN
as 2:2024cv01837
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDAWAY v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOSKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01845
Plaintiff:
TITO HOSKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stovall v. Warden of SCI-Muncy et al
as 2:2024cv01839
Petitioner:
ARCELIA TRUMAINE STOVALL
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Muncy and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff:
DUPREE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GREGORY BRIGGZ, C.O. ROBINSON, SAVASIA CARABALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
