Patent Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,087
STORMBORN TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. NETRONIX GROUP, INC.
as 2:2021cv01443
Plaintiff: STORMBORN TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant: NETRONIX GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BOUND2B B.V. v. XOLUTION, GMBH
as 2:2021cv00476
Defendant: XOLUTION, GMBH
Plaintiff: BOUND2B B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
FUGAZZI v. CAROTHERS
as 2:2021cv00277
Defendant: ATTORNEY FLOYDE B. CAROTHERS
Plaintiff: JOAN C. FUGAZZI
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CANON INC. v. THE SUPPLIES GUYS, LLC
as 5:2021cv01099
Defendant: THE SUPPLIES GUYS, LLC and THE SUPPLIES GUYS, INC.
Plaintiff: CANON INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
J Morita MFG v. Dental Imaging Technologies
as 2:2021cv00663
Defendant: Kavo Kerr Group and Dental Imaging Technologies
Plaintiff: J Morita MFG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al v. GRECIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00562
Defendant: WILLIAM GRECIA
Plaintiff: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
STORMBORN TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2021cv01168
Plaintiff: STORMBORN TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant: USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Xodus Medical, Inc. et al v. Active Medical, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00476
Plaintiff: Alessio Pigazzi, Xodus Medical, Inc. and Glenn Keilar
Defendant: Active Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
EYENAVISION, INC. v. ENCHROMA, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00246
Defendant: ENCHROMA, INC.
Plaintiff: EYENAVISION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Lehman v. Air Dynamics Industrial Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00076
Defendant: Daniel Phillip Lehman and Air Dynamics Industrial Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Daniel Aaron Lehman
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?