Cases 91 - 100 of 7,881
Ladenburger v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04059
Petitioner:
Robert Reilly Ladenburger
Respondent:
State of South Dakota and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Haaland
as 5:2024cv05006
Plaintiff:
Iris Wilson
Defendant:
Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Yocum v. Pankonin
as 4:2024cv04017
Plaintiff:
Harriet Michelle Yocum
Defendant:
Maxine Pankonin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grevengoed v. Dix et al
as 4:2024cv04029
Plaintiff:
Galen Grevengoed
Defendant:
Dr. Brian Dix and Avera McKennan doing business as Avera Medical Group Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
New Life Treatment Center, Inc. v. Sanford Health Plan
as 4:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
New Life Treatment Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Sanford Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nyemah v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Harry Nyemah
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Hines v. Rosado et al
as 4:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hines
Defendant:
Raymond Rosado, Howard Moore and Antonio Urquiola Cortinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schneider v. Badhand
as 3:2024cv03008
Plaintiff:
Justin James Schneider
Defendant:
Lt. Badhand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baha Townhouses, LLP v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 4:2024cv04035
Plaintiff:
Baha Townhouses, LLP
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and Marcia L. Fudge
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
