Cases 101 - 110 of 242
Dennis Campbell, et al v. Postmaster General of the US
as 15-2668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
GATSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 2:2015cv05068
Plaintiff:
TOKYO GATSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LANGER v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2015cv03610
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LANGER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WADHWA v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2015cv02777
Plaintiff:
DOM WADHWA, M.D.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CONTANT v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS") et al
as 2:2015cv00494
Plaintiff:
ISAN CONTANT
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS") and IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT ("ICE")
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RAD v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2015cv02415
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and MARK COYEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
KELLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 2:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW R. KELLY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CADDELL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv07988
Plaintiff:
EDDIE CADDELL , KRYZSTOF JAJE and STANLEY PRENENSKI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CONLEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 3:2014cv05829
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CONLEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Beam v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2014cv01706
Plaintiff:
Troy Beam
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
