Cases 101 - 110 of 201
Federal National Mortgage Assocaition et al v. Nelson et al
as 4:2016cv11653
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Assocaition, GMAC , PATI Real Estate Holdings and others
Defendant:
Anne M. Nelson and Paul N. Papas, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Furey et al v. Town of Lynnfield et al
as 1:2016cv10510
Plaintiff:
Steven Furey , Martin Katz and Michael Walsh
Defendant:
Town of Lynnfield , David Nelson , Philip Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United Van Lines v. Nelson
as 1:2016cv10309
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Kimberly Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steiner v. Draftkings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10297
Plaintiff:
Nelson C. Steiner
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc. and FanDuel Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Valdez v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv10175
Plaintiff:
Nelson Valdez
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Katopodis v. Elias et al
as 1:2015cv13817
Plaintiff:
Gregory John Katopodis
Defendant:
Nelson Elias and Darren Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andro v. Town of Brookline et al
as 1:2015cv13030
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Andro
Defendant:
Town of Brookline, Daniel C. O'Leary, Michael John McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
NELSON v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12263
Plaintiff:
IRMGARD NELSON
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harihar v. US Bank NA et al
as 1:2015cv11880
Plaintiff:
Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant:
US Bank NA, RMBS CMLTI 2006 AR-1, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
