Cases 101 - 110 of 343
HOWARD v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv01766
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOWEN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00220
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, CHAPLIN MILLER, Captain LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HART v. SMITH et al
as 5:2020cv05236
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
TYRIEFF HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOLSTON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv00301
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
DWAYNE A. GOLSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HENRY v. CLINE et al
as 3:2020cv00206
Defendant:
MR. BARRY SMITH, MS. K. KERI MOORE, MS. D. VARVER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SPADA v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv00298
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
ZACHARY THOMAS SPADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARD v. CRAWFORD et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
CO CRAWFORD, JANET PEARSON and BARRY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOLT v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv01416
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MATTISE J. HOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUSSI v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv04580
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Petitioner:
MIGUEL RUSSI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HYMAN v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv04429
Respondent:
MR. BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAVON HYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
