Cases 101 - 110 of 110
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
ACUITY v. CURRY
as 1:2011cv00722
Plaintiff:
ACUITY
Defendant:
ROBIN CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Srivastava v. Payne et al
as 2:2011mc00025
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Herz Srivastava
Defendant:
James Payne , Mitchell Daniels , Randall Shepard and others
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv00565
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Marie Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Currie v. Austin Mohawk and Company Inc
as 1:2009cv00243
Plaintiff:
Douglas T Currie and Douglas T Currie
Defendant:
Austin Mohawk and Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams et al v. Henderson et al
as 2:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
Richard Williams and Delane Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Henderson, Daniel Henderson, Curry Ice & Coal Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LEAGUE v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00597
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LEAGUE
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, WENDY KNIGHT, FRANCES OSBORN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PRICKETT v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CURRIE et al
as 1:2007cv00898
Plaintiff:
SHAWN PRICKETT
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CURRIE, STANLEY KNIGHT, HOUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00132
Plaintiff:
Tiaa Curry and Tiaa Curry
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc, Johnson & Johnson Inc, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
