Cases 101 - 110 of 225
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv06468
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WILLIAM P. BARR and THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TESTA v. DOE POTATO et al
as 3:2020cv05511
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DOE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISORS OF FBI AGENT JAMES SIMPSON, JACK HOBAN, JOSEPH ACHACOSO, DOE AGENT IN CHARGE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M. V. v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv05310
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
M. V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2020cv02403
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2020cv01472
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2020cv00775
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2020cv00721
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2019mc00009
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF ORIGINAL JURISIDICTION NO. 36 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF PABLO PATRICIO TOLOSA V. MONDELEZ ARGENTINA S.A., ET AL.
as 2:2019cv19023
In Re:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF ORIGINAL JURISDICTION NO. 36 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF PABLO PATRICIO TOLOSA V. MONDELEZ ARGENTINA S.A., ET AL
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
