Cases 101 - 110 of 1,010
MOORE v. REGALE et al
as 1:2023cv02170
Plaintiff:
DERRIOUS MOORE
Defendant:
DENNIS REGALE, FOX, CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv02176
Plaintiff:
HOLLIS WILLIAMS, IV
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VERMILLION et al v. CENTURION HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, INC., JOHN L. MERSHON, VERNON L. OSBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARCHMAN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH PARCHMAN
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, TOWN OF INGALLS, INDIANA, AQUA INDIANA, INDIANA and others
Not Classified By Court:
GREGORY L. LAKER, CONNER DICKERSON and MARK SNIDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ALLEN
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, JOHN DOE, DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHLOE WARGNY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUKES v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
ISSAC JACIEL LUKES and ISAAC JACIEL LUKES
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, L. HAMBIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTEAD v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv02079
Plaintiff:
MARCUS A. ARMSTEAD
Defendant:
BROWN, SUMMERS, SOLOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARSON v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
QUEJUAN B.D. CARSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOYD
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, JACK SURGUY and A. ADEFILA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
