Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 137
Bradley v. Barrow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00033
Petitioner: Michael Paul Bradley
Respondent: Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wingfield v. Barrow et al
as 3:2010cv00022
Petitioner: Paul Wingfield
Respondent: Donald Barrow and Thurbert Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wingfield v. Barrow et al
as 1:2010cv00934
Petitioner: Paul Wingfield
Respondent: Donald Barrow and Thurbert Baker
Howard v. Mullis et al
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff: Lamont Howard
Defendant: Terrie Mullis, Todd Tripp, Donald Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Wilkes et al
as 4:2010cv00048
Plaintiff: Lamont Howard
Defendant: Scott Wilkes, Ayaz Chaudhary, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Wilkes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff: Lamont Howard
Defendant: Scott Wilkes, Ayaz Chaudhary, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Barrow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2009cv00144
Petitioner: Chad Shaw
Respondent: Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Barrow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00060
Plaintiff: David Timothy Moore
Defendant: Donald Barrow, Misty Winter, Sam Zanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Barrow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00125
Petitioner: Borish Jenkins
Respondent: Donald Barrow and Thurbert Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copeland v. Barrow
as 1:2009cv01893
Petitioner: Reggie D. Copeland
Respondent: Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?