Cases 101 - 110 of 369
Ingram v. Ahmed et al
as 2:2019cv02062
Defendant:
Dr. Brookhart, Michael S Deimel, Dr. F Ahmed and others
Plaintiff:
Kendrick H Ingram, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Residential Solutions, Inc. v. Freeman et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
All Unknown Occupants and Janet Freeman
Plaintiff:
Residential Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Presley v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08097
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC, AbbVie Products, LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Freeman Presley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Hopper et al
as 3:2018cv02150
Defendant:
Lt. DeWeese, C/O Freeman, Warden Goins and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Lawrenceville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Jeffery Molenhour, Jerry D. Tanner, Lawrenceville Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Mack Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2018cv02144
Defendant:
Kevin Reichert, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Counselor Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey W. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Freeman et al
as 3:2018cv02029
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, Jacqueline Lashbrook, C/O Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Mickey Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salley v. Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01343
Defendant:
. Massey, L.T.B. Johnson, . Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Dontaneous Salley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman Equipment, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 1:2016cv09172
Plaintiff:
Freeman Equipment, Inc.
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Michael Arquero v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv06017
Plaintiff:
Michael Arquero
Defendant:
P.O. Sharmaun Freeman #11568, City of Chicago and P.O. Yolanda Collier #19806
Petitioner:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
