Cases 101 - 110 of 817
Hartfield et al v. Fisher
as 4:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Chezza Hartfield, Reggie McPhaul and Keith Franklin
Defendant:
Michael J. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Smith v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Dr Mays et al
as 4:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Mays, Dr. Chad Hara and Antonie & Ernest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 9:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Monica Lee Ann Franklin and Antwan Franklin
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Franklin v. City of Paris Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Courtney Franklin
Defendant:
City of Paris Police Department and Gary Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan et al v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Byron K. Morgan, Gary A. Patten and William David Franklin
Defendant:
Timothy P. Kauffman and Christian Aid Ministries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin v. Lamar County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Courtney Franklin
Defendant:
Lamar County Jail, Judge Tidwell and Paul Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Tony L Franklin and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Krystal Simmons, Justin C Sand-Wable and Rocky N Moore
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Franklin v. Moore et al
as 4:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tony L Franklin
Defendant:
Rocky N Moore, Krystal Simmons and Justin C Sand-Wable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Knowles
as 4:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Ephesian Johnny Franklin
Defendant:
Beyonce Giselle Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
