Cases 101 - 110 of 1,134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HILL v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ANTIJUAN HILL
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, LYNN GIBSON, HEATHER DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breedlove et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Harrison Breedlove, Haakon Brekke, Connor Smith and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Hill, John or Jane Does 1-20, Clayton County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Star 2 - STAR 2021 SFR2 Borrower, L.P. v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Star 2 - STAR 2021 SFR2 Borrower, L.P.
Defendant:
Nikia Hill and Shantelle Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Bedrock Clover Ranch LLC et al v. Hill
as 1:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Bedrock Clover Ranch LLC, David Pirtle and Mobile Home Living Investments LLC
Defendant:
Darmenthia Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Brown v. Coker et al
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
Brian A. Coker and Mulberry Hill Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Hill
as 1:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Defendant:
Victor Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BH Management et al v. Hill
as 1:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
BH Management and PDQ Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Zakiyatt Hill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
