Cases 101 - 110 of 535
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv00818
Defendant:
Biomet Manufacturing Corp., Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Harrison Peterson, Jr. and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv00816
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., Biomet Manufacturing Corp., Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Harrison Peterson, Jr. and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Peterson, Jr. v. Biomet Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00819
Defendant:
Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC, Biomet Manufacturing Corp., Biomet Orthopedics LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Harrison Peterson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Montgomery County
as 4:2021cv00769
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenberg et al v. First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00302
Defendant:
Ryan Bourgeois, Dustin Dreher, Dee Ann Gregory and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Wayne Rosenberg and Aviva M. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Moore et al
as 4:2021cv00294
Defendant:
Asst Warden Kuforiji, Officer Linville and Warden R Moore
Plaintiff:
George D. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nankervis v. Harrison County, Texas
as 2:2020cv00372
Petitioner:
Tyler Jonathan Nankervis
Respondent:
Harrison County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Starke v. State of Texas
as 3:2020cv03334
Plaintiff:
Charles B Starke, Jr
Defendant:
State of Texas, Adam Pauyer, NFN Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings v. Lumpkin
as 5:2020cv01279
Respondent:
James Harrison and Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Tam-Monta L. Hastings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Novak v. Parker, et al
as 5:2020cv00248
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Smith Unit, Cody R. Parker, Latrista C. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
