Cases 101 - 110 of 492
Edtl v. Best Buy Stores, Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ben Edtl
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores, Limited Partnership, Chris Davis, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Lane County et al
as 6:2021cv01866
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Lane County, Alfredo Velez, Nathan Gent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tandy v. Rogue Real Estate Sales & Property Management et al
as 6:2021cv01750
Plaintiff:
Dennis Napper Tandy, Jr.
Defendant:
Rogue Real Estate Sales & Property Management, Regional Manager Paula Dodge and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Grassley et al
as 3:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
Duard Holcomb
Defendant:
Dr. Grassley, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaldson v. Peters et al
as 6:2021cv01670
Plaintiff:
Shawn Donaldson and Shawna
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Troy Bowser, Blewett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaldson v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv01625
Plaintiff:
Shawna Michael Donaldson and Shawn Michael Donaldson
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Colette Peters, Garrett Laney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Misuraca v. Loke et al
as 3:2021cv01585
Plaintiff:
Airian Jovan Misuraca
Defendant:
Jamie Lake, Harmony Jones, Bryan Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koch v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv01579
Plaintiff:
Amy Michelle Koch
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Brian Belleque, Rob Persson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 6:2021cv01576
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Ross
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Coos County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behringer v. City of Ashland et al
as 1:2021cv01520
Plaintiff:
Liese Behringer
Defendant:
City of Ashland, Providence Health Care, Tighe O'Meara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
