Cases 101 - 110 of 231
Ronnie Halton v. Lupe Valdez
as 13-10225
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONNIE HALTON
Respondent - Appellee:
LUPE VALDEZ
Williams v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
Clifford Williams
Defendant:
City of Dallas , Mary K Suhm , David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McBride v. Reyna et al
as 3:2013cv00833
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith McBride
Defendant:
Raul Reyna, K Samet, Lupe Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Dallas County Jail et al
as 3:2013cv00678
Plaintiff:
Michael James Carson
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail, Lupe Valdez, County Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giddings v. Dallas County Sheriff Lupe Valdez
as 3:2013cv00391
Petitioner:
Gerry D Giddings
Respondent:
Dallas County Sheriff Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Molden v. Dallas County Sheriff Lupe Valdez
as 3:2013cv00179
Petitioner:
Marcus Molden-Bey
Respondent:
Dallas County Sheriff Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halton v. Valdez
as 3:2012cv05153
Petitioner:
Ronnie Halton
Respondent:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stiff v. Stinson et al
as 3:2012cv04998
Plaintiff:
Devon Stiff
Defendant:
Joseph Stinson, Craig Watkins, Rick Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Perkins v. Andy Chatham, et al
as 12-11203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY LEE PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE ANDY CHATHAM, 282nd District Court of Dallas County, Texas, DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, CRAIG WATKINS, Dallas County District Attorneys Office and others
Perkins v. Chatham et al
as 3:2012cv03651
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Defendant:
Andy Chatham, Dallas Co. Public Defenders Office, Craig Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
