Cases 101 - 110 of 1,149
Murphy v. Hobo Construction Company et al
as 1:2022cv05336
Plaintiff:
Devon Murphy
Defendant:
Hobo Construction Company, Bullfighter Construction, Inc. and Jesus Rico
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Colombe v. Murphy et al
as 9:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Gerald F. Colombe, III and Gerald F. Colombe
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Murphy, John A. Winchell, LT Breyear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillon v. Rosen et al
as 1:2022cv07035
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Dillon
Defendant:
Harvey Rosen, James McQueeney, Esq., Bonnie Wittner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sowell et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv06538
Plaintiff:
Male Randy Sowell and Desire Diamond Samuels Sowell
Defendant:
NYSDOCCS Anthony J. Annucci, NYDC Commissioner Cynthia Brann, Phil Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06359
Plaintiff:
Sean Riley
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., G. Kelly Martin, Owen Hughes and others
Booker v. Flint et al
as 9:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Diquan Booker
Defendant:
Sgt. Flint, Officer Murphy and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06171
Plaintiff:
James Walton
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Catherine J. Friedman, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
Schnupp v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06117
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schnupp
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Catherine Friedman, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
Wang v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06116
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, M.D., Catherine Friedman and others
Sullivan v. City of Glens Falls et al
as 1:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Lyndsea K. Sullivan
Defendant:
City of Glens Falls, Glens Falls Police Department, Officer Bradley Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
