Cases 101 - 110 of 299
LAWSON v. DOE 1, et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, GILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, SECURITY OFFICE and OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
REYES-BURGADO v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv00155
Petitioner:
PEDRO REYES-BURGADO
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DUBOISE et al v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
RYAN DUBOISE and CARRINGTON KEYS
Defendant:
OVERMYER, BERLIN, ROSS BUSCEMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WURST v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00336
Petitioner:
ANDREW JEROME WURST
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMPSON v. OVERMYER
as 3:2017cv00234
Petitioner:
ANTHONY R. THOMPSON
Respondent:
M. D. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KESSLER v. OVERMYER
as 2:2017cv01629
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS KESSLER
Respondent:
M. D. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Overmyer et al v. Acumed LLC
as 1:2017cv00510
Defendant:
Acumed LLC
Plaintiff:
David L Overmyer and Karen Overmyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ETZWEILER v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00327
Petitioner:
DUSTIN ETZWEILER
Respondent:
M.D. OVERMYER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEYES v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00325
Petitioner:
MALCOLM KEYES
Respondent:
M.D. OVERMYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
