Cases 101 - 110 of 177
BINKLEY v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2015cv00497
Plaintiff:
JEROME BINKLEY
Defendant:
PAULA DICKERSON, KROUST, MASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. EF TRANSIT, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00081
Defendant:
EF TRANSIT, INC., DEBRA PANKOW and PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
HAYWARD PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PETERSON v. DAVOL, INC.
as 1:2015cv00012
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC.
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Peterson v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01754
Plaintiff:
Ricky Peterson
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet Inc, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01093
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
TAMARA J PETERSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
PETERSON v. DIETER et al
as 1:2014cv00923
Defendant:
DIETER, GRAY, CHRIS MORRISON and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IMO 2014 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2014mc00062
Respondent:
Sara Elizabeth Corbat, Danel Michelle Nickels, Duane Jonathan Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
PETERSON v. SNIDER
as 1:2014cv00725
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Defendant:
SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. MORRISON et al
as 1:2014cv00655
Defendant:
C. MORRISON, BEN SANDMAN and MR. SNIDER
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
