Cases 101 - 110 of 349
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02556
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez v. Napier et al
as 4:2018cv00413
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Mark Napier and Unknown Padilla
Plaintiff:
Rolando Roman Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean v. Strada et al
as 2:2018cv02476
Defendant:
B Sanchez Othon and Frank Strada
Plaintiff:
Wilson Yazzie Jean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaca v. Risen et al
as 2:2018cv02414
Defendant:
Steven Dye, Unknown Moore, Bill Risen and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Vaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02011
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Sanchez
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01889
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sanchez
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders #146274 v. Trinity Services Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01471
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin Sanders
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group Incorporated, Laura Donnelly, Unknown De Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leon-Sanchez #171224 v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 4:2018cv00208
Petitioner:
Manuel Leon-Sanchez
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith et al v. AKAL Security Incorporated
as 2:2018cv01117
Plaintiff:
Roy Smith , Juan J Aguilar , Curtis Baughman and others
Defendant:
AKAL Security Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00910
Plaintiff:
Galo A Diaz and Anna Sharp
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated , Corizon Incorporated, Corizon LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
