Cases 101 - 110 of 395
RIVEROS-SANCHEZ et al v. CITY OF EASTON et al
as 5:2019cv00545
Defendant:
ELIZABETH GEHMAN, JOHN BAST and CITY OF EASTON
Plaintiff:
EDGAR RIVEROS-SANCHEZ and MARIA RIVEROS -SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FINISHMASTER, INC. et al v. MARLASAN ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00518
Defendant:
MARLASAN ENTERPRISES, INC. and GILBERTO SANCHEZ
Plaintiff:
AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS, LLC and FINISHMASTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20151
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff:
ELAINE SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROOMALL et al v. SANCHEZ
as 2:2019cv00293
Plaintiff:
HARRY BROOMALL, III and CYNTHIA BROOMALL
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ALBERT SANCHEZ, JR
3Rd Party Defendant:
SELENA B. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00088
Defendant:
XXXXX WALKER, JAMES MCCANTS, GERALD MAY and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. United States Of America
as 4:2018cv02415
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Jaime Fernando Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANCHEZ v. THE COUNTY OF BUCKS et al
as 2:2018cv05381
Defendant:
WARMINSTER TOWNSHIP, THE COUNTY OF BUCKS, SEAN HAROLD and others
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pagan et al v. White et al
as 1:2018cv02317
Defendant:
Warden Douglas K. White and J. Ray Ormond
Plaintiff:
Others Similarly Situated, Edwin Michael Brown, Angel M. Pagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANCHEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2018cv05018
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ANA LUZ SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SANCHEZ v. SCI-CAMPHILL
as 4:2018cv02110
Plaintiff:
Vincent J. Sanchez
Defendant:
Sci-Camphill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
