Cases 101 - 110 of 128
Fawley v. Johnson et al
as 2:2010cv00175
Plaintiff:
Benjamin William Fawley
Defendant:
William E. Johnson, Christopher J. Collins, John S. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen Shaw
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Springer v. Shaw et al
as 1:2009cv01410
Plaintiff:
Levi Springer
Defendant:
William H. Shaw, Lynn S. Mendibur and Thomas N. Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Johnson
as 2:2009cv00593
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Shaw
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Springer v. Shaw et al
as 1:2009cv01339
Plaintiff:
Levi Springer
Defendant:
William H. Shaw, Prentis Smiley, Jr. and Eileen M. Addison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alf v. Donley et al
as 1:2009cv01190
Plaintiff:
Lori L. Alf
Defendant:
Michael B. Donley, Robert M. Gates, Steven A. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Family and Medical Leave Act
Shaw v. Watson
as 1:2009cv00876
Petitioner:
Emmanuel King Shaw
Respondent:
Byron Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. Deputy Aguirre et al
as 1:2009cv00834
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Shaw
Defendant:
Deputy Aguirre and Deputy Mireles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowser v. Gloucester County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2009cv00444
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bowser
Defendant:
Gloucester County Circuit Court, William H. Shaw, III, Warren Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
