Cases 101 - 110 of 137
Tsang et al v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00427
Plaintiff:
Gary Tsang , Adrian Vilchez , Markiss Ybarra and others
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00083
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US Bank National Association v. Suesing Tsang et al
as 5:2011cv02059
Defendant:
Does and Suesing Tsang
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Burdman v. China Medical Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv09297
Plaintiff:
Vyacheslav M. Burdman
Defendant:
China Medical Technologies, Inc., Wu Xiaodong and Takyung Tsang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nancy Shao Wen Chu et al
as 2:2011cv09859
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Eric Jon Strasser, Elizabeth Tsang and Nancy Shao Wen Chu
Sue Tsang v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01709
Defendant:
Bank of America National Association, Does, Litton Loan Servicing LP and others
Plaintiff:
Sue Tsang
Speculative Product Design, Inc. v. Hing Tsang et al
as 2:2011cv01604
Defendant:
Does and Hing Tsang
Plaintiff:
Speculative Product Design, Inc.
Sue Tsang v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc et al
as 5:2011cv00287
Defendant:
Does, Select Portfolio Servicing Inc and US Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Sue Tsang
TSANG v. WU et al
as 2:2010cv04856
Plaintiff:
HIN KWAN TSANG
Defendant:
WHITING WU, NOVEM WONG, TONY TSAO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chen et al v. Next Level Trading Capital LLC et al
as 1:2010cv02842
Plaintiff:
Ling Chen, Bao Zhen Liang, Chen Qiang and others
Defendant:
Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Dime Community Bancshares, Inc., Does 1 through 15 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
