Cases 101 - 110 of 2,992
Tapscott v. United States
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Shirley Tapscott
Defendant:
Steven Gray, Matt Norfleet, Mary Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 oc Notice of Removal - Other Contract
Norris v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Mark Norris
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. FCI Memphis Warden et al
as 5:2022cv00285
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
FCI Memphis Warden and United States of America Wardens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Dominique Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. $158,146.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$158,146.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Bradley v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
James Bradley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. $29,000.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$29,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Simmons v. United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Simmons
Defendant:
United States of America and Esque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
USA v. $16,399.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$16,399.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Sutherland v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00237
Petitioner:
Eric C. Sutherland
Respondent:
United States and Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
