Cases 101 - 110 of 346
Clinton County, Missouri v. Allergan PLC et al
as 4:2019cv03169
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Kathe Sackler, Michael Babich and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pike County, Missouri v. Allergan PLC et al
as 4:2019cv03170
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Kathe Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
Pike County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott County, Missouri v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00207
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Walmart Warehouse #45, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Scott County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Stuckey v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 3:2019cv05092
Defendant:
Mark Lashley and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Clydean Stuckey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lincoln County v. Sackler et al
as 4:2019cv02953
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Caremark RX, LLC, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Lincoln County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wieberg v. Wal-Mart Inc.
as 3:2019cv05083
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc.
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Wieberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camden County v. Williams et al
as 4:2019cv02930
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Caremark RX, LLC, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Camden County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00700
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Vincent v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP et al
as 5:2019cv06099
Plaintiff:
Keslyn Vincent
Defendant:
Jon Doe 1, Mary Susan Sanders and Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
