Cases filed in North Dakota
Cases 101 - 110 of 125
Cochell v. Pokorny Chiropractic Clinic et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00031
Plaintiff: Melissa Cochell, Melissa Cochell and Melissa Cochell
Defendant: Pokorny Chiropractic Clinic, David Pokorny DC, Richard Pokorny DC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hernandez v. State of North Dakota
as 3:2009cv00049
Petitioner: Mario D Hernandez
Respondent: State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iverson v. Social Security Commissioner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00128
Plaintiff: Brian D Iverson
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
In re: Douglas D. Sletten
as 1:2008mc00019
McKay v. Tharaldson, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00113
Interested Party: Roy Blassingame
Defendant: Gary D. Tharaldson and Tharaldson Motels Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Plaintiff: Bernard McKay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hoffman et al v. Tharaldson Motels Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00109
Plaintiff: Richard Hoffman and Dean Manternach
Defendant: Dale Beling, ESOP Committee of the Tharaldson Motels Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, The, Douglas Dobmeier and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
In re: Richard D. Varriano
as 1:2008mc00012
In re: Dennis D. Fisher
as 1:2008mc00011
Harrington v. Red River Valley & Western Railroad Company
as 3:2008cv00082
Plaintiff: Roger D. Harrington
Defendant: Red River Valley & Western Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sample v. Konrad et al
as 3:2008cv00037
Plaintiff: Anne D. Sample
Defendant: Kristean Dale Konrad and Jeffrey Lee Olson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?