Cases 101 - 110 of 779,421
Wilson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01962
Plaintiff:
Marvin Wilson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jackson
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bretzius v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Bret Bretzius
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lochner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01964
Plaintiff:
Trisha Lochner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roskey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01968
Plaintiff:
Richard Roskey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keller v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
Nadine Keller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Handeland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
Daryl H. Handeland
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosen v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
Marianna Rosen
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and Cyclace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Craig Dibble v. Torax Medical, Inc., et al
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
Craig Dibble
Defendant:
Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Dickson v. Buyers Products Company et al
as 1:2024cv10519
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dickson
Defendant:
VT Leeboy, Inc., Buyers Products Company and William F. Pierce, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
