Cases 101 - 110 of 808,560
HAIRSTON v. STATE OF INDIANA/INDPLS. et al
as 1:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
STARR HAIRSTON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA/INDPLS., FISHERS COMMUNITY NORTH HOSPITAL, IPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Varnas v. Thompson et al
as 2:2024cv02193
Plaintiff:
Maria Varnas
Defendant:
Conner Thompson and Olathe, Kansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Clark v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeanie Clark
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Leet v. Cotone et al
as 6:2024cv00586
Not Yet Classified:
Government of Iberia Parish
Plaintiff:
Heath Leet
Defendant:
Tim Cotone, Deputy Kaila Chipman, Iberia Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
