Cases 111 - 120 of 16,132
Energy Center Omaha, LLC v. 222 S. 15th Street, LLC
as 8:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Energy Center Omaha, LLC
Defendant:
222 S. 15th Street, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Sipple v. Kramer et al
as 4:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Adam T Sipple
Defendant:
Deputy Roland Kramer and Devin Ruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Ruff et al
as 4:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
James T. Mitchell
Defendant:
Sergeant Devin Ruff, Deputy Roland Kramer and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Griffin v. Omaha Police Dept.
as 8:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Omaha Police Dept and County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daly Dejillas v. RAM, L.L.C. et al
as 8:2024cv00075
Defendant:
Ralph Murdock, RAM, L.L.C. and Ralph Murdock, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cailin Daly Dejillas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
McDowell v. Nebraska State Fire Marshals Office
as 4:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
John Harvey McDowell
Defendant:
Nebraska State Fire Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Factory Mutual Insurance Company v. Vencomatic, Inc
as 8:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Vencomatic, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Cerros v. Fannon
as 8:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Joel A. Cerros
Respondent:
Steve Fannon
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
