Cases 111 - 120 of 349
Steele v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv03393
Defendant:
Tavarreus Pounds, Duane Whisenhunt, Doug Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Clifton Wayne Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundy et al v. Friendship Pavilion Acquisition Company, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00112
Defendant:
Friendship Pavilion Acquisition Company, LLC, Michael Weinstein, Richard T. Winegarden and others
Plaintiff:
David Sundy, Nova-Lee Graber and Tim Sundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRELL v. DODGE COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2018cv00218
Plaintiff:
LISTER HARRELL
Defendant:
DODGE COUNTY GEORGIA , TIM VAUGHN , LYNN SHEFFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunch-Keemer Bey v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv02860
Plaintiff:
Delores Edith Bunch-Keemer Bey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Georgia Magistrate Court of Cobb County, Michael McLaughlin and others
SLATER v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CHANCE SLATER
Defendant:
CARLTON POWELL, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, RON JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huggins et al v. Isaac et al
as 3:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Keila Huggins and Maurice Huggins
Defendant:
Keith Isaac, Tim Pierson and Peyton Allen Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02515
Plaintiff:
Tim Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steele v. Pounds
as 1:2018cv01989
Petitioner:
Clifton Wayne Steele
Respondent:
Tim Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eaton et al v. Atlanta Supersource, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01791
Plaintiff:
James Corey Eaton , Steven Paul Smith and Scott Thomas Tibbetts
Defendant:
Atlanta Supersource, Inc. and Tim Martin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
