Cases 111 - 120 of 237
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 17-35465
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 17-35463
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
NORTHWEST RIVER PARTNERS
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 17-35467
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF IDAHO, KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF MONTANA
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 17-35462
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Blue Water Baltimore, Inc. et al v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2017cv01253
Defendant:
Scott Pruitt , Cecil A. Rodrigues and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Blue Water Baltimore, Inc. , Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and American Rivers
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Los Angeles Waterkeeper et al v. Pruitt et al
as 2:2017cv03454
Plaintiff:
American Rivers, Los Angeles Waterkeeper and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Pruitt, Alexis Strauss and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Toyota Tsusho Petroleum PTE. Ltd. v. Sinoriches Enterprises Co., Ltd.
as 1:2017cv00438
Plaintiff:
Toyota Tsusho Petroleum PTE. Ltd.
Defendant:
Sinoriches Enterprises Co., Ltd.
Garnishee:
Archer Archer-Daniels-Midland Company , ADM Logistics, Inc. , ADM Investor Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Brown v. American River Transportation Company, LLC
as 2:2017cv02255
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brown
Defendant:
American River Transportation Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Blue Water Baltimore, Inc. v. Scott Pruitt
as 17-1258
Petitioner:
BLUE WATER BALTIMORE, INC., NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INCORPORATED and AMERICAN RIVERS
Respondent:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CECIL ANTHONY RODRIGUES, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for Region III of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Los Angeles Waterkeeper, et al v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 17-70570
Petitioner:
LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and AMERICAN RIVERS
Respondent:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ALEXIS STRAUSS, in her official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for Region IX of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
