Cases 111 - 120 of 345
McPeters v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
April Diane McPeters
Defendant:
Tony C Parker, Alisha Shoates James, David Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christy v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jamey Ray Christy
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Eric Bryant, Danny Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Cheatham County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv01335
Plaintiff:
Margaret Craig
Defendant:
Cheatham County, Tennessee, Ben Moore, Keith Rakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex ("BCCX")
as 1:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
Bryant M. Hunt
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex ("BCCX")
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex ("BCCX")
as 1:2017cv01168
Plaintiff:
Bryant M. Hunt
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex ("BCCX")
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al
as 2:2017cv02589
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Plaintiff:
Patsy Bryant
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saito et al v. Vasos et al
as 3:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
Glenn Saito , Barry Lai , Myron Nakata and others
Defendant:
Todd Vasos , Michael M. Calbert , Warren F. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant, et al v. TN Board of Cosmetology and Barbering
as 2:2017cv02565
Plaintiff:
Cleophus Bryant and Pyramid Barber and Nail School
Defendant:
TN Board of Cosmetology and Barbering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Bryant et al
as 3:2017cv01067
Plaintiff:
Jordan Norris
Defendant:
Mark Bryant , Josh Marriott and Jeff Key
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Machoka v. City of Collegedale et al (TV2)
as 1:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
David B Machoka and Agnes K Machoka
Defendant:
City of Collegedale, Kat Cooper, Jacinta Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
