Cases 111 - 120 of 168
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv10949
Plaintiff:
Debra Johnson and James Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sonnary Tina Chhim v. Debra Johnson
as 3:2013cv01050
Petitioner:
Sonnary Tina Chhim
Respondent:
Debra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
La Jolla Bank, FSB v. Tarkanian et al
as 1:2013mc00014
Defendant:
Danny Tarkanian, Amy M. Trkanian, Jerry Tarkanian and others
Plaintiff:
La Jolla Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725 Collection under Contract Guaranty
LA JOLLA BANK, FSB v. TARKANIAN et al
as 1:2013at00246
Defendant:
DANNY TARKANIAN, AMY M. TARKANIAN, JERRY TARKANIAN and others
Plaintiff:
LA JOLLA BANK, FSB
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725
Chhim v. Johnson
as 3:2013cv00961
Petitioner:
Sonnary Tina Chhim
Respondent:
Debra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Tarkanian et al
as 2:2013cv00760
Defendant:
Josephine Diamant, Zafrir Diamant, Debra Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Tarkanian et al
as 2:2013ms00025
Defendant:
Josephine Diamant, Zafrir Diamant, Debra Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Shanay Stacy v. Debra Johnson
as 13-71334
Petitioner:
SHANAY SHARHONDA STACY
Respondent:
DEBRA JOHNSON
Sonnary Tina Chhim v. Debra Johnson
as 2:2013cv02344
Petitioner:
Sonnary Tina Chhim
Respondent:
Debra Johnson
Timothy Roberson v. Tennessee Department of Correc, et al
as 13-5253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY ROBERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GAYLE RAY, TDOC Commissioner, JENNIE JOBE, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
