Cases 111 - 120 of 3,514
THORNTON v. BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE et al
as 2:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. THORNTON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, BEAVER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv00457
Petitioner:
FRANK TAYLOR, JR.
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOWELL et al v. BIDDEFORD BLANKETS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
FRANK SOWELL and SUZANNE SOWELL
Defendant:
BIDDEFORD BLANKETS, LLC, TARGET CORPORATION and CORPORATE JOHN DOE DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
SOWELL v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Frank Sowell, Suzanne Sowell and SUZANNE POWELL
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, BIDDEFORD BLANKETS, LLC and CORPORATE DOE DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moton v. Garman et al
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Defendant:
Mr. Garman, Deputy Houser, Mr. Vangorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. Ransom et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kyle Rainey
Defendant:
Kevin Ransom, Jason Bohinski, Richardo Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capalaces v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Frank Capalaces
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VESPE v. FUENTES et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
FRANK VESPE
Defendant:
Roy Fuentes, Wand Topco, AMAZON.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Moore v. Filer et al
as 3:2022cv02073
Plaintiff:
Braxton J. Moore
Defendant:
Eric James Filer, Frank Menne, David Wapinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
