Cases 111 - 120 of 175
Antigo et al v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2011cv00408
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Antigo , Eduardo Deytiquez , Roberto Verzo, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Michael V. Lombardi, U.S. Opportunities, LLC, Royal Hospitality Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Hearn v. The Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
Betty Smith Hearn
Defendant:
The Hinds County Board of Supervisors , Hinds County Public Works, Carl Frelix and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Graham v. Wilson et al
as 1:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Tommica Graham
Defendant:
Gabe Wilson and The City of New Albany, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trinity USA Operating, LLC v. Barker et al
as 4:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Trinity USA Operating, LLC
Defendant:
Vickie Bingham, Betty Sue Graham Bunn, Beverly Calandro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Graham v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jan D. Graham
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Sammy M. Sappington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham et al v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Graham and Richard Graham
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hutton v. Epps et al
as 4:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta K. Hutton
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Kenneth Reagans and Joann Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Nelson v. Reagans et al
as 4:2011cv00005
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hawkins Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Reagans, MDOC, EMCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
