Cases 111 - 120 of 159
Anthony et al v. Durham School Services, L.P. et al
as 1:2013cv00757
Plaintiff:
Vicki Anthony , Helen Rexrode , Stephanie Urosa and others
Defendant:
Durham School Services, L.P. and Durham D&M LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hamilton, III v. Negi, M.D.
as 1:2013cv00712
Plaintiff:
Floyd Hamilton, III
Defendant:
Dr. Shivani Negi, M.D.
Movant:
Maryland General Hospital
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Woodlin v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2013cv00690
Plaintiff:
John Woodlin
Defendant:
John Wolfe , Allen Gang, Lt. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHASE v. JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE et al
as 8:2012cv03573
Plaintiff:
Warren Chase
Defendant:
JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE, JUDGE DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MARYLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garris et al v. Nuckols et al
as 1:2012cv02417
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris and Garris Family Members
Defendant:
Al Nuckols, Cecil C. Stone, III, Kelli S. Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. Nuckols et al
as 1:2012cv02416
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris and Garris Family Members
Defendant:
Al Nuckols, Cecil C. Stone, III, Kelli S. Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Alterman
as 8:2012cv01968
Plaintiff:
Larry Hamilton
Defendant:
Alterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2012cv01920
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Smith
Defendant:
Mr. Wolfe, Mr. Gang, Lt. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01912
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
